Social media for collaborative learning: A review of school literature
AbstractSocial media are widely seen as having transformational potential in school education. However, there is a surprising lack of empirical research in schools about the pedagogical designs of social media and particularly the factors that facilitate or hinder desirable outcomes. Consequently, this paper offers a review of the limited empirical research literature, and is particularly valuable because it not only focuses on school contexts, when the literature is dominated by the tertiary sector, but also because it carefully excludes uses of social media that do not leverage its particular affordances, that is, social interactivity. Findings reveal a series of design principles for educators, including three broad conclusions that social media for collaborative purposes is best utilised when: (a) social media is not redundant to current practices but offer something new, (b) strategies are in place to help students learn how to work collaboratively, and (c) the tasks are appropriate.
Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. UK: JISC Technology & Standards Watch. Retrieved from www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf. (20 January, 2012).
Austin, R., Smyth, J., Rickard, A., Quirk-Bolt, N. & Metcalfe, N. (2010). Collaborative digital learning in schools: Teacher perceptions of purpose and effectiveness. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19 (3): 327-343.
ACMA (Australian Communications and Media Authority) (2009). Click and connect: Young Australians’ use of online social media (quantitative report). Canberra, Melbourne & Sydney: Australian Communications and Media Authority.
Barron, B., Walter, S., Martin, C. & Schatz, C. (2010). Predictors of creative computing participation and profiles of experience in two Silicon Valley middle schools. Computers & Education, 54: 178-189.
Bryant, L. (2007). Emerging trends in social software for education. In Emerging technologies for learning (Vol. 2) (pp. 9-18). Coventry: Becta.
Burnett, C. & Merchant, G. (2011). Is there a space for critical literacy in the context of social media? English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10 (1): 41-57.
Calvani, A., Fini, A., Ranieri, M. & Picci, P. (2012). Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers. Computers & Education, 58: 797-807.
Chandra, V. & Watters, J. (2012). Re-thinking physics teaching with web-based learning. Computers & Education, 58, 631-640.
Clark, W., Logan, K., Luckin, R., Mee, A. & Oliver, M. (2009). Beyond Web 2.0: Mapping the technology landscapes of young learners, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25: 56-69.
Crook, C., Fisher, T., Graber, R., Harrison, C., Lewin, C., Logan, C., Luckin, R., Oliver, M. & Sharples, M. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape – opportunities, challenges and tensions. Coventry: Becta: BECTA Research Report.
De Almeida Soares, D. (2008). Understanding class blogs as a tool for language development. Language Teaching Research, 12 (4): 517-533.
DeGennaro, D. (2008). Learning designs: An analysis of youth-initiated technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 4 (1): 1-20.
Desilets, A. & Paquet, S. (2005). Wiki as a tool for web-based collaborative story telling in primary school: A case study. Paper presented at EdMedia 2005, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
De Zwart, M., Lindsay, D., Henderson, M. & Phillips, M. (2011). Teenagers, legal risks and social networking sites. Clayton: Monash University.
Duncan-Howell, J. & Lloyd, M. (2008). Discussing, sharing and collaborating: Distributed constructionism goes online. Paper presented at the Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane.
Eynon, R. & Malmberg, L.-E. (2011). A typology of young people’s Internet use: Implications for education. Computers & Education, 56: 585-595.
Geer, R. & Sweeney, T. (2010). Telling it like it is: Digital journeys. In D. Gron & G. Romeo (Eds) ACEC2010: Digital diversity. Conference Proceedings of the Australian Computers in Education Conference 2010, Melbourne 6-9 April, Carlton, Vic: Australian Council for Computers in Education (ACEC). Retrieved from http://acec2010.acce.edu.au/proposal/508/what-cen-be-learned-digistories-about-contenporary-learning-environments-schools.
Gomez, M., Schieble, M., Curwood, J. & Hassett, D. (2010). Technology, learning and instruction: Distributed cognition in the secondary English classroom. Literacy, 44 (1): 20-27.
Grant, L. (2009). “I DON’T CARE DO UR OWN PAGE!“ A case study of using wikis for collaborative work in a UK secondary school. Learning, Media and Technology, 34 (2): 105-117.
Green, L., Brady, D., Olafsson, K., Hartley, J. & Lumby, C. (2011). Risks and safety for Australian children on the internet. EU kids online, The London School of Economics and Political Science.
Greenhow, C., Robelia, B. & Hughes, J. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age. Educational Researcher, 38: 246-259.
Hastie, P., Casey, A. & Tarter, A-M. (2010). A case study of wikis and student-designed games in physical education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19 (1): 79-91.
Heafner, T. & Friedman, A. (2008). Wikis and constructivism in secondary Social Studies: Fostering a deeper understanding. Computers in the Schools, 25 (3-4): 288-302.
Hew, K., Cheung, W. & Ng, C. (2010). Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: A review of the research and empirical exploration. Instructional Science, 38(6):571-606.
Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittant, M., boyd, d., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P., Pascoe, C. & Robinson, L. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning.
Joubert, M. & Wishart, J. (2011). Participatory practices: Lessons learnt from two initiatives using online digital technologies to build knowledge. Computers & Education, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.024.
Kaplan, A. & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53: 59-68.
Knobel, M. & Lankshear, C. (2006). Weblogs, worlds and constructions of effective and powerful writing: Cross with care, and only where signs permit. In K. Pahl & J. Rowsell (Eds.) Travel notes from the new literacy studies: Instances of practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Lai, H.-M. & Chen, C.-P. (2011). Factors influencing secondary teachers’ adoption of teaching blogs. Computers & Education, 56: 948-960.
Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies. Third Edition. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and mobile internet use among teens and young adults. PewInternet: Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org (10 January, 2012).
Liu, C.-C., Liu, K.-P., Chen, W.-H., Lin, C.-P. & Chen, G.-D. (2011). Collaborative storytelling experiences in social media: Influence of peer-assistance mechanisms. Computers & Education, 57 (2): 1544-1556.
Livingstone, S. & Brake, D. (2010). On the rapid rise of social networking sites: New findings and policy implications. Children and Society, 24: 75-83.
Livingstone, S. & Haddon, L. (2009). EU kids online: Final report. LSE, London: EU kids online. Retrieved from http://www2.lse.ac.uk (23 July, 2010).
Luckin, R., Logan, K., Clark, W., Graber, R., Oliver, M. & Mee, A. (2008) Learners’ use of Web 2.0 technologies in and out of school in Key Stages 3 and 4. Coventry: Becta.
Luckin, R., Clark, W., Graber, R., Logan, K., Mee, A., Oliver, M. (2009). Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11-16-year-old students. Learning, Media and Technology, 34 (2): pp. 87-104.
Lund, A. (2008). Wikis: A collective approach to language production. ReCALL, 20 (1): 35-54.
Maher, D. (2009). The importance of elementary school students’ social chat online: Reconceptualising the curriculum. Computers & Education, 53: 511-516.
Maher, D. (2010). Supporting students’ transition from primary school to high school using the Internet as a communication tool. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19 (1): 17-30.
Mak, B. & Coniam, D. (2008). Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong. System, 437-455.
Marttunen, M. & Laurinen, L. (2007). Collaborative learning though chat discussions and argument diagrams in secondary school. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40 (1): 109-126.
Minocha, S. (2009). Role of social software tools in education: A literature review. Education & Training, 51 (5-6): 353-369.
Owen, M., Grant, L., Sayers, S. & Facer, K. (2006). Social software and learning. Bristol: Futurelab.
Pifarre, M. & Fisher, R. (2011). Breaking up the writing process: how wikis can support understanding the composition and revision strategies of young writers. Language and Education, 25 (5): 451-466.
Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, wikis, podcasts and other powerful web tools for classrooms. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.) Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. (pp. 97-118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sweeney, T. & Geer, R. (2010). Students’ use of ICT in the early years. In D. Gron & G. Romeo (Eds) ACEC2010: Digital diversity. Conference Proceedings of the Australian Computers in Education Conference 2010, Melbourne 6-9 April, Carlton, Vic: Australian Council for Computers in Education (ACEC). Retrieved from http://acec2010.acce.edu.au.
Tan, J. (2009). Digital kids, analogue students : a mixed methods study of students' engagement with a school-based Web 2.0 learning innovation. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology.
Valk, A., Atticks, A., Binning, R., Manekin, E., Schiff, A., Shibata, R. & Townes, M. (2011). Engaging communities and classrooms: Lessons from the Fox Point oral history project. Oral History Review, 38 (1), pp. 136-157.
Van den Beemt, A., Akkerman, S. & Simons, P. (2010). Pathways in interactive media practices among youths. Learning, Media and Technology, 35 (4): 419-434.
Van den Beemt, A., Akkerman, S. & Simons, P. (2011). Patterns of interactive media use among contemporary youth. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27: 103-118.
Wishart, J. & Triggs, P. (2010). Museum Scouts: Exploring how schools, museums and interactive technologies can work together to support learning. Computers & Education, 54: 669-678.
Wong, R. & Hew, K. (2010). The impact of blogging and scaffolding on primary school pupils’ narrative writing: A case study. International Journal of Web-based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 5, 2, 1-17.
Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262-307.
Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R. & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds. Education Technology Research and Development, 55: 117-145.
Zywica, J., Richards, K. & Gomez, K. (2011). Affordances of a scaffolded-social learning network, On the Horizon, 19 (1): 33-42.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).