A Computer Assisted Intervention on Learning Strategies

  • Antonio Manuel Manuel University of Lisbon


The objective of this study, in the Student Approaches to Learning (SAL) perspective, was to test a computer-assisted intervention that seeks to promote awareness and self-regulation of learning strategies, aiming at improving the quality of learning. The intervention involved the use, by a sample of higher education students, of purposely developed interactive software – the PAE v.1 - which basically allows users to self-assess, recognize and self-regulate learning strategies. Pre- and post-intervention measures of the learning process and product were compared, both in general and individually, according to the experimental methodology. The results suggest that the intensive implementation of the intervention was effective in generally increasing a deep learning strategy and, in some cases, reducing a surface strategy and increasing an achieving strategy, but not significantly enough under these conditions, to improve the quality of learning. It is suggested a way of using the intervention procedure to achieve such an improvement. Keywords: interactive learning environments; multimedia/hypermedia systems; post-secondary education; teaching/learning strategies

Author Biography

Antonio Manuel Manuel, University of Lisbon
Faculty of Psychology, Assistant Professor


AK, S. (2011). The effects of computer supported problem based learning on students’approaches to learning. Current Issues in Education, 14(1). Retrieved 30-4-2015 from http://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/712

Bailey, P., Catchpole, R. & Smart, J. (1997). Skills shop – A learning skills package. Plymouth: University of Plymouth.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bran, C. N. (2014). Strategies for developing a deep approach of learning in higher education. Journal Plus Education, 11(2), 130-140.

Beckwith, J. B. (1991). Approaches to learning, their context and relationship to assessment performance. Higher Education, 22, 17-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02351197

Biggs, J. B. (1984). Learning strategies, student motivation patterns, and subjectively perceived sucess. In J. R. Kirby (Ed.), Cognitive strategies and educational performance (pp.111-134). Orlando, F.L.: Academic Press.

Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: ACER.

Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.

Biggs J. & Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: the SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.

Biggs, J., Kember, D. & Leung D.Y.P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709901158433

Biggs, J. B. & Kirby, J. R. (1983). Approaches to learning in Universities and CAEs. Vestes, 27(2), 3-9.

Biggs, J. B. & Rihn, B. A. (1984). The effects of intervention on deep and surface approaches to learning. In J. R. Kirby (Ed.), Cognitive strategies and educational performance (pp.279-293). Orlando: Academic Press.

Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (3rd ed.) Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press

Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co. Inc.

Blundell, S. (1995). Should we always be aiming to promote deep approaches to learning? An evaluation of the ISL questionnaire in practice. In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Improving student learning through assessment and evaluation (pp.257-279). Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff Development.

Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers and students. Learning & Instruction, 7(2), 161-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1

Boekaerts, M. & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x

Cano, F. (2007). Approaches to learning and study orchestrations in high school students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(2), 131-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03173518

Cristhensen, L.B. (2007). Experimental methodology (10th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon

Diseth, A. (2013). Personality as an indirect predictor of academic achievement via student course experience and approach to learning. Social Behavior and Personality, 41(8), 1297-1308. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.8.1297

Duarte, A. M. (2007). Conceptions of learning and approaches to learning in Portuguese students. Higher Education, 54, 781-794. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9023-7

Duarte, A. M. (2012). Modification of conceptions of and approaches to learning by metacognition and changes in the learning context. In T. Patellis (Ed.). Research Studies, Literature Reviews and Perspectives in Psychological Science (pp. 133-143). Athens: Atiner – Athens Institute for Education and Research.

Entwistle, N. J. (1988). Motivational factors in students' approaches to learning. In R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp.21-51). N.Y.: Plenum.

Entwistle, N. J., Odor, P. & Anderson, C. (1987). Anticipating the experience of higher education through computer simulation. Higher Education, 16, 337-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00148974

Entwistle, N. J. & Ramsden, N. (1983). Understanding student learning, London & Camberra: Croom Helm.

Entwistle, N., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 33-48. http://doi.org/cgvfh9

Entwistle, N. J. & Wilson, J.D. (1977). Degrees of exelence: the academic achievement game. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

English, L., Luckett, P. & Mladenovic, R. (2004). Changing the learning environment to promote deep learning approaches in first year accounting students. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 13(4), 461-488.

Flesch, R. (1979). How to write plain English. New York: Harpercollins.

Gibbs, G. (1992). Improving the quality of student learning: theory and practice. Bristol: TES.

Goldberg, M.W. & Salari, S. (1997). An update of WebCT (Word-Wide-Webb Course Tools) - a Tool for the creation of sophisticated web-based learning environments. Paper presented to NAUWeb'9 Flagstaff, Arizona. Dowloaded in 6-4-1999 from


Gunn, C. (1995). Usability and beyond: Evaluating educational effectiveness of computer-based learning. In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Improving student learning through assessment and evaluation (pp.301-315). Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff Development.

Kember, D., Jamieson, Q.W. Pomfret, M & Wong, E.T. (1995). Learning approaches, study time and academic performance. Higher Education, 29, 329-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01384497

Kybby, M., Gunn, C., MacIntyre, R. Gow, A., Granun, G. & Whyte, J. (1995). CLASS - Couseware for learning and study skills. University of Strathclyde – Heriot-Watt University.

Kozéki, B. & Entwistle, N.J. (1987). Interaction between pupil characteristics and school ethos - a review of earlier collaborative work and a proposal for a further comparative study of Hungarian and British schools. Edinburgh: Reports of research in progress - Department of Education, University of Edinburgh

Laurillard, D. (2005). Styles and approaches in problem-solving. In F.Marton, D.Hounsell, N.Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning : Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (3rd Ed.) (pp. 126 – 144). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment.

Liping Chen & Dhillon, J. J. (2012). Deep approaches to learning in improving reading skills: a case study from Yunnan Agricultural University. Theory & Practice In Language Studies, 2(8), 1603-1613. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.8.1603-1613

Marton, F. & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning - I. Outcome and process. Brittish Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x

McCune, V. (1998). Academic development during the first year at university. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning - Improving students as learners (pp. 354–358). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development.

McCune, V. (1999). Providing learning to learn advice via the WWW. Paper presented at the “6th. Pedactice conference”. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive-behavior modification, an integrative approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Neuman, S.B. & McCormick S. (1995). Single-subject experimental research: applications for literacy. Newark: IRA.

Newman D. R., Johnson, C., Webb, B. & Cochrane C. (1998). Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported co-operative learning. Downloaded in 23-5-1999 from http://www.qub.ac.uk/mgt/papers/jasis/jasis.html

Perls, F. (1969). In and out the garbage pail. New York: Bantam Books.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.). Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego: Academic Press.

Platow, M. J., Mavor, K. I. & Grace, D. M. (2013). On the role of discipline-related self-concept in deep and surface approaches to learning among university students. Instructional Science, 41, 271-285. doi 10.1007/s11251-012-9227-4

Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Students’ approaches to learning and teachers’ approaches to teaching in higher education, Educational Psychology, 25 (6), 673–680

Richardson, J. T. E. (2007). Variations in student learning and perceptions of academic quality. In N. Entwistle, P. Tomlinson, & J. Dockrell (Eds.), Student learning and university teaching (British Journal of Educational Psychology, Monograph Series II, No. 4) (pp. 61–71). Leicester: The British Psychological Society.

Solomonides, I. & Swanell, M. (1995). Can students learn to change their approach to study? In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Improving student learning through assessment and evaluation (pp. 225-232). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development.

Svensson, L. (1977). On qualitative differences in learning - III.Study skill and learning. Brittish Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 233-243.

Tait, H., & Entwistle, N. (1996). Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies. Higher Education, 31, 97-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00129109

Trigwell, K. & Prosser, M. (1991). Relating approaches to study and quality of learning outcomes at the course level. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 265-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1991.tb00984.x

Watkins, D. (1983). Depth of processing and the quality of learning outcomes. Instructional Science, 12, 49-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00120900

Wilson, S. L. (2000). Single case experimental designs. In G. M. Breakwell,S. Hammond & C. Fife-Schaw (Eds.). Research methods in psychology (pp.60-74). London: Sage

Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students’ approaches to learning: Comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 87–101.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego: Academic Press.

Zimmerman, B. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Zimmerman, B. J. & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299-315). New York: Routledge.

Zou, L.-H., Li, J., Chen,W.-C., Zhong, M.-L., Wang, Z.-Y. (2014). Relationship between learning quality and learning approaches of high school students on the subject of chemistry. International Conference on Science Education 2012 Proceedings, pp. 163-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54365-4_14

How to Cite
Manuel, A. (2018). A Computer Assisted Intervention on Learning Strategies. Australian Educational Computing, 33(1). Retrieved from http://journal.acce.edu.au/index.php/AEC/article/view/156
Research Articles (Refereed/Reviewed)