Improving Learning Experiences Through Gamification: A Case Study
Abstract
Gamified learning systems are becoming increasingly common within educational institutions, however there is a lack of understanding on the elements of gamification that influence, either positively or negatively, the learning experiences of students using these systems. This study examines an existing gamified learning tool implemented within an Australian university, and explores the aspects of this system that impact upon the student experience. It was found that positive influences included a combination of motivational and game-based elements such as presentation of content, self-efficacy of learning experiences, and feedback that positively influence students. Additionally, aspects of the system that negatively influenced learning experiences included issues such as interaction flaws and compatibility issues.References
AINSWORTH, S., LOIZOU, A.T. 2003. The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. In Cognitive Science. 27, 669–681.
BARGER, A., AND BYRD, K. 2011. Motivation and Computer-Based Instructional Design. In Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education. 4, 1–9.
BATTIN-PEARSON, S., NEWCOMB, M.D., ABBOTT, R.D., HILL, K.G., CATALANO, R.F., AND HAWKINS J.D. 2000. Predictors of Early High School Dropout: A Test of Five Theories. In Journal of Educational Psychology. 92, 568–582.
BRAND, J.E.: Digital Australia 2012. 2011. Interactive Games and Entertainment Association. Available online at http://www.igea.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/DA12FinalLinkVideo.pdf.
CHEN, J. 2007. Flow in Games (and everything else). In Communications of the ACM. 50, 31–34.
COLTHEART, V. 1999. Fleeting Memories: Cognition of Brief Visual Stimuli. 1st ed. MIT Press.
CORDOVA, D., AND LEPPER, M.R. 1996. Intrinsic Motivation and the Process of Learning: Beneficial Effects of Contextualization, Personalization, and Choice. In Journal of Educational Psychology. 88, 715–730.
CROOKALL, D., AND THORNGATE, W. 2008. Acting, Knowing, Learning, Simulating, Gaming. In Simulation & Gaming. 40, 8–26.
CSIKZENTMIHALYI, M. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial: New York.
DARLING-HAMMOND, L. 2010. The Flat World and Education: How America's Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future. Teachers College Press.
DECI, E.L., AND RYAN, R.M. 2000. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. In Contemporary Eductional Psychology. 25, 54–67.
DECI, E.L., AND RYAN, R.M. 2008. Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological wellbeing across lifes domains. In Canadian Psychology. 49, 14–35.
DICKEY, M.D. 2005. Engaging by Design: How engagement strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design. In Educational Research and Development. 53(2), 67–83.
DOUGLAS, T., SALTER, S., AND CAPSTICK, M. 2011. Using Digital Game Based Resources to Engage Students in First Year Human Life Sciences. In Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 3, 1–20.
DURIK, A.M., AND HARACKIEWICZ, J.M. 2003. Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: Coherence, concordance, and achievement orientation. In Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 39, 378–385.
DZULKIFLI, M., AND MUSTAFAR, M. 2013. The Influence of Colour on Memory Performance: A Review. In The Malaysian Journal of Medical Science. 20, 3–9.
FREDRICKS, J.A., AND BLUMENFELD, P.C. 2004. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. In Review of Educational Research. 74, 59–109.
FREEMAN, S., EDDY, S.L., MCDONOUGH, M., SMITH, M.K., OKOROAFOR, N., JORDT, H., AND WENDEROTH, M.P. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 201319030.
GARRIS, R., AHLERS, R., AND DRISKELL, J.E. 2002. Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model. In Simulation & Gaming. 33, 441–467.
GAUCI, S.A., AND DANTAS, A.M., WILLIAMS, D.A., KEMM, R.E. 2009. Promoting Student-Centered Active Learning in Lectures with a Personal Response System. In Advances in Physiology Education. 33, 61–70.
HSUA, M.H., JUB, T.L., YENC, C.H., AND CHANGA, C.M. 2007. Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Virtual Communities: The Relationship Between Trust, Self-Efficacy, and Outcome Expectations. In International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 65, 153–169.
HUIZENGA, J., ADMIRAAL, W., AKKERMAN, S., AND DAM, G.T. 2009. Mobile game-based learning in secondary education: engagement, motivation and learning in a mobile city game. In Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 332–344.
KOLB, D.A. 1984. The Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs.
LINBERG, K.R. 1999. Software Developer Perceptions about Software Project Failure: A Case Study. In Journal of Systems and Software. 49, 177–192.
MARTENS, B.K., BRADLEY, T.A., AND ECKERT, T.L. 1997. Effects of Reinforcement History and Instructions on the Persistence of Student Engagement. In Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 30, 569–572.
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL & INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE. 2003. Engaging Schools: Fostering High School Students' Motivation to Learn. The National Academies Press: Washington DC.
OBLINGER, D. 2004. The Next Generation of Educational Engagement. In Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 2004(8), Special Issue on the Educational Semantic Web.
PARAS, B., AND BIZZOCCHI, J. 2005. Game, Motivation, and Effective Learning: An Integrated Model for Educational Game Design. Presented at the DiGRA 2005 September 24.
PIVEC, M., AND KEARNEY, P. 2007. In Games for Learning and Learning from Games, Informatica. 31, 419–423.
PRENSKY, M. 2002. The Motivation of Gameplay: The Real Twenty-First Century Learning Revolution. In On the Horizon, 10, 5–11.
RABE-HEMP, C., AND WOOLLEN, S. 2009. A Comparative Analysis of Student Engagement, Learning, and Satisfaction in Lecture Hall and Online Learning Settings. In Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 10, 207–218.
RAYMOND, C. 2010. Do Role-Playing Simulations Generate Measurable and Meaningful Outcomes? A Simulation’s Effect on Exam Scores and Teaching Evaluations. In International Studies Perspectives. 11, 37–51.
RIEBER, L.P., AND NOAH, D. 2008. Games, simulations, and visual metaphors in education: antagonism between enjoyment and learning. In Educational Media International. 45, 77–92.
RYAN, R.M., MIMS, V., AND KOESTNER, R. 1983. Relation of Reward Contingency and Interpersonal Context to Intrinsic Motivation: A Review and Test Using Cognitive Evaluation Theory. In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 45, 736–750.
SFARD, A. 1998. On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One. In Educational Researcher, 27, 4–13.
SHERNOFF, D.J., CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M., SCHNEIDER, B., AND SHERNOFF, E.S. 2003. Student Engagement in High School Classrooms from the Perspective of Flow Theory. In School Psychology Quarterly. 18, 158–176.
SHERNOFF, D.J., AND HOOGSTRA, L. 2001. Continuing Motivation Beyond the High School Classroom. In New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. 93, 73–87.
SOBEL, R.K. 2005. MSL-Medicine as a Second Language. In New English Journal of Medicine. 352(19), 1945–1946.
SQUIRE, K., BARNETT, M., GRANT, J.M., AND HIGGINBOTHAM, T. 2004. Electromagnetism supercharged!: learning physics with digital simulation games. Presented at the ICLS '04: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Learning sciences, June.
URQUHART, C., LEHMANN, H., AND MYERS, M.D. 2010. Putting the 'theory' back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. In Information Systems Journal. 20(1), 257–381.
VAN ECK, R. 2006. Digital Game-Based Learning: It's Not Just the Digital Natives Who Are Restless. In EDUCAUSE Review. 41, 16–30.
WHEELER, S.M. 2006. Role-Playing Games and Simulations for International Issues Courses. In Journal of Political Science Education. 2, 331–347.
WULFF, H.R. 2004. The Language of Medicine. In Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 97(4), 187–188.
YIN, R.K. 1998. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
