Building a Culture of Trust
Abstract
This paper investigates the place of trust in a school context and its importance in achieving the aims of schooling, “namely high academic performance and positive affects among members of the school community” (Forsyth, 2008). The role of trust in the use of technology and technological change is examined. Literature is surveyed in the fields of trust in the school community and trends which are impacting technology use in schools. The concept of collaborative and participatory culture in particular is examined. Digital citizenship is presented as a necessary component of an educational technology program. Some general suggestions for developing a culture of trust are presented.References
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2011). General Capabilities, from http://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum/general_capabilities.html
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology 39(5), 775-786. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
Botsman, R. (Producer). (2012, 12 April 2013). The currency of the new economy is trust. TED Talks. [Talk] Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/rachel_botsman_the_currency_of_the_new_economy_is_trust.html
Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What's mine is yours. The rise of collaborative consumption. New York: Harper Collins.
Brisbane School of Distance Education (BSDE). (2012). Curriculum Enhancement Projects. Retrieved 12 April 2013, from http://brisbanesde.eq.edu.au/wcms/index.php/about-bsde/curriculum-enhancement-projects
Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools. A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2003). Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for School Reform. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 40-45.
Buckingham, D. (2007). Beyond Technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Casilli, C. (2012). Mozilla Open Badges: building trust networks, creating value. Retrieved from http://carlacasilli.wordpress.com/2012/08/24/mozilla-open-badges-building-trust-networks-creating-value/
Christian, K., Morrison, F., & Bryant, F. (1998). Predicting kindergarten academic skills: Interactions among child care, maternal education, and family literacy environments. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13(3), 501-521.
Doda, N. (2011). Trust : The key to leading a learning school Middle Level Leader. Retrieved from https://www.nassp.org/tabid/3788/default.aspx?topic=Trust_The_Key_to_Leading_a_Learning_School
Epstein, J. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Epstein, J. (2002). School, family, and community partnerships. Your handbook for action. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Forsyth, P. B. (2008). The empirical consequences of school trust. In W. K. Hoy & M. DiPaola (Eds.), Improving schools: studies in leadership and culture. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Friedman, T. L. (2006). The world is flat. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
Gaffney, M. (2010). Foreword. In M. Lee & G. Finger (Eds.), Developing a networked school community. A guide to realising the vision. (pp. v-vii). Camberwell: ACER.
Grant, L. (2010). Developing the home-school relationship using digital technologies. Retrieved from www.futurelab.org.uk
Grant, S., & Shawgo, K. E. (2013). Digital Badges: An Annotated Research Bibliography. . Retrieved from http://hastac.org/digital-badges-bibliography
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
Henderson, A. (1987). The evidence continues to grow: Parent involvement improves student achievement. Annotated bibliography. National Committee for Citizens in Education. Columbia, MD.
Henderson, A., & Mapp, K. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin, Texas: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Herther, N. K. (2009). Digital natives and immigrants: what brain research tells us. Online 33(6), 15-21.
Holmes, B. (2010). Parent perspectives on the digital home-school nexus. In M. Lee & G. Finger (Eds.), Developing a networked school community. A guide to realising the vision. (pp. 171-186). Camberwell: ACER.
Hoy, W. K., & Kupersmith, W. (1984a). Principal authenticity and faculty trust: Key elements in organizational behavior. Planning and Changing, 15(2), 80-88.
Hoy, W. K., & Kupersmith, W. (1984b). The concept of trust: An empirical assessment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association.
Hoy, W. K., & Kupersmith, W. (1985). The meaning and measure of faculty trust. Educational and Psychological Research, 5, 1-10.
Illinois Institute of Design. (2007). Schools in the digital age. Retrieved from https://www.id.iit.edu/research-projects/faculty-led-research/schools-in-the-digital-age/
Internet Safety Technical Taskforce. (2008). Enhancing child safety and online technologies. The Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University.
Isard, J. (2013). Can e-learning be as effective as classroom learning. Education Technology Solutions, April 2013, 37-40.
Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture. Media education for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/titles/free_download/9780262513623_Confronting_the_Challenges.pdf
Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Haywood, K. (2011). The NMC Horizon Report: 2011 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Kirkman, J. (2012). Don't panic! A hitch hiker's guide to teaching the digital native. Professional Educator, 11(3), 7-9.
Knight, E. (2012). RFC: An Open, Distributed System for Badge Validation. Working paper. Mozilla Foundation.
Larkin, K., Finger, G., & Thompson, R. (2010). Student health and welfare in networked school communities. In M. Lee & G. Finger (Eds.), Developing a networked school community. A guide to realising the vision. (pp. 277-289). Camberwell: ACER.
Laurillard, D. (2008). Digital technologies and their role in achieving our ambitions for education. Retrieved from http://eprints.ioe.ac.uk/628/1/Laurillard2008Digital_technologies.pdf
Lee, M. (2010). Schools and the digital technology: An overview. In M. Lee & G. Finger (Eds.), Developing a networked school community. A guide to realising the vision. (pp. 33-50). Camberwell: ACER.
Lee, M., & Gaffney, M. (2008). Creating a nexus between homes and schools. In M. Lee & M. Gaffney (Eds.), Leading a digital school. Principles and practice. (pp. 68-79). Camberwell: ACER.
Lee, M., & Levins, M. (2010). Homes and the digital technology. A home-school difference or digital divide? In M. Lee & G. Finger (Eds.), Developing a networked school community. A guide to realising the vision. (pp. 51-72). Camberwell: ACER.
Lee, M., & Levins, M. (2012). Bring your own technology. The BYOT guide for schools and families. Camberwell: ACER.
Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2005). Teen content creators and consumers. Washington: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
Leslie, S. (2013). The disruption higher ed doesn't see coming (and how it could respond, even lead, but probably won't). Retrieved from http://www.edtechpost.ca/wordpress/2013/02/20/badges/
Levin, B. B., & Schrum, L. (2013). Technology-Rich Schools Up Close. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 51-55.
Mackenzie, J. (2009). Family Learning. Engaging with Parents. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press.
Maher, D., & Lee, M. (2010). Student Internet usage in a networked school community. The challenge. In M. Lee & G. Finger (Eds.), Developing a networked school community. A guide to realising the vision. (pp. 241-258). Camberwell: ACER.
Meir, D. (2002). In schools we trust. Creating communities of learning in an era of testing and standardization. Boston, MA: Beacon press.
Molnar, A. S. (1997). Computers in Education: A Brief History. T H E Journal (Technological Horizons In Education), 24(11), 63-68.
Partnership for 21st century skills. Framework for 21st century learning Retrieved 12 April 2013, from http://www.p21.org
Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives. Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Project Tomorrow. (2011). The new three E's of education. Enabled, engaged and empowered: Speak Up 2010 National Findings.
Ribble, M. (2013). Nine themes of digital citizenship. Retrieved 12 April 2013, from http://www.digitalcitizenship.net/Nine_Elements.html
Sanders, M. G. (1997). Building effective school–family–community partnerships in a large urban school district. (Vol. 13). Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk.
Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native - myth and reality. Paper presented at the Aslib: New Information Perspectives.
Selwyn, N., Potter, J., & Cranmer, S. (2010). Primary Schools and ICT. Learning from Pupil Perspectives. London: Continuum.
Shaw, A. (2008). Planning in a digital school. In M. Lee & M. Gaffney (Eds.), Leading a digital school. Principles and practice. (pp. 30-37). Camberwell: ACER.
Villa-Boas, A. (1993). The effect of parent involvement in homework on student achievement. Baltimore: Unidad, Winter (2).
Wells, A. (2013). The Gonski review of funding for schooling. Education Technology Solutions, February 2013, 74-76.
Wessling, S. B. (2011). Trust, Professionalism, and Truth. Lessons Learned in Finland. Education Update, 53. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/newsletters/education-update/may11/vol53/num05/Trust,-Professionalism,-and-Truth.aspx
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
