Investigating in-service teachers' workplace TPACK development
Abstract
Technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) provides a theoretical lens which attempts to identify the nature of knowledge required by teachers for technology integration in their teaching. While there have been hundreds of studies that have used TPACK to examine what teachers need to know about technology as part of their classroom practice, there has been little research specifically investigating how we acquire this knowledge, especially in relation to in-service secondary teachers. This paper investigates workplace learning literature in an attempt to provide a theoretical grounding that will enable future investigations to examine the complex context in which professional educators develop individual knowledge within a socially mediated, participatory workplace culture.References
Albion, P., Jamieson-Proctor, R., & Finger, G. (2010). Auditing the TPACK Confidence of Australian Pre-Service Teachers: The TPACK Confidence Survey (TCS). Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010, San Diego, CA, USA. http://www.editlib.org/p/33969
Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71-88.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Fansisco: Jossey Bass.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Beckett, D., & Hager, P. (2002). Life, work and learning: Practice in postmodernity. (Vol. 14). London and New York: Routledge.
Bennett, C. D., & Dewar, J. M. (2012). An Overview of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Mathematics. PRIMUS, 22(6), 458-473.
Benson, R., & Brack, C. (2009). Developing the scholarship of teaching: what is the role of e-teaching and learning? Teaching in Higher Education, 14(1), 71-80.
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Berliner, D. (1988). Implications of studies of expertise in pedagogy for teacher education and evaluation. Paper presented at the 1988 ETS Invitational Conference, Princeton, NJ.
Billett, S. (2001). Knowing in practice: Re-conceptualising vocational expertise. Learning and Instruction, 11, 431-452.
Butler, D., Lauscher, H., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Beckingham, B. (2004). Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education and Special Education, 20(5), 435-455. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2004.04.003
Chai, C. S., Ling Koh, J. H., Tsai, C.-C., & Lee Wee Tan, L. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184-1193. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007
Cox, S. (2008). Chapter 4: Results. Technical Use Analysis [Web blog post]. Retrieved from http://coxedel3250blog.blogspot.com.au/
Elkjaer, B. (2003). Organisational learning with a pragmatic slant. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(5), 481- 494.
Engestrom, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen & R.-L.
Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work; Towards an activity-theoretical reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.
Engestrom, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamaki, R.-L. (1999). Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113-136.
Feldman, A. (1994). Teachers learning from teachers: Knowledge and understanding in collaborative action research: ERIC Clearinghouse.
Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2003). Learning as apprentices in the contemporary UK workplace : Creating and managing expansive and restictive participation. Journal of Education and Work, 16(4), 407- 426.
Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2004). Expansive learning environments: Integrating organisational and personal development. In H. Rainbrid, A. Fuller & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace Learning in Context (pp. 126-144). London: Routledge.
Garmston, R. J., & Wellman, B. M. (2013). The adaptive school: A sourcebook for developing collaborative groups: Rowman & Littlefield.
Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical knowledge (TPACK). Computers and Education, 57, 1953-1960.
Hager, P. (2005). Current theories of workplace learning: A critical assessment. In N. Basica, A. Cumming, A. Datnow, K. Leithwood & D. Livingstone (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Policy (pp. 829-846). Great Britian: Springer.
Jordan, K., & Dinh, H. (2012). TPACK: Trends in current research. Paper presented at the Australian Computers in Education Conference (ACEC), 2012, Perth, Australia.
Kayser, C. (1916). The federation and th eproposed modern langauge journal. The Modern Language Journal, 1(1), 1-9.
Kelly, M. A. (2008). Bridging digital and cultural divides: TPCK for equity of access to technology. In AACTE Committee on Inovation and Technology (Ed.), The Handbook of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators. New York: Routledge.
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 483-497.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In Search of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science: Developing Ways of Articulating and Documenting Professional Practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370-391.
Marsick, V., & Watkins, K. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London: Routledge.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Musanti, S. I., & Pence, L. (2010). Collaboration and Teacher Development: Unpacking Resistance, Constructing Knowledge, and Navigating Identities. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(1), 73-89.
Schoenfield, A. H. (1999). Looking toward the 21st Century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 4-14.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of research in education, 24, 173-209.
Winch, C. (1998). The philosophy of human learning. London: Routledge.
Zottmann, J. M., Stegmann, K., Strijbos, J.-W., Vogel, F., Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2013). Computer-supported collaborative learning with digital video cases in teacher education: The impact of teaching experience on knowledge convergence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 2100-2108.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
