Teacher professional conversations – the oz-Teachers story
Abstract
The oz-Teachers listserv, an email list for teachers, ran continuously for 20 years, from 1995 to 2015. It provided the technical infrastructure for professional communication with the majority of its members being Australian teachers based in classrooms across the country. An analysis of the list archives provides us with interesting insights as to how teachers learn from and within communities of their peers and how such communities offer social and educational affordances to allow teachers to generate and enhance their own learning. This paper begins with a brief review of the response to the announcement of the list’s closure. It then moves to a report of the types of communication which emerged from the list over time with comparisons drawn from extant research, namely, an early analysis of email lists and a more contemporary study of teacher communication through microblogging. We identified 14 categories with eight of these being paired, namely, as asking/seeking and responding/giving. The key finding of this analysis was that the list, and its professional discussions, were sustained through reciprocity and collective intelligence, that is, sharing of information and resources and that this was evident through the life of the listservReferences
Atkinson, R. (1999). The secret life of Echalkers: Workplace learning and DIY professional development. Paper presented at the ECAWA Conference, 1999. Retrieved from http://www.roger-atkinson.id.au/pubs/ecawa99/atkinson.html
Couros, A. (2006). Examining the open movement: Possibilities and implications for education. PhD thesis, University of Regina, Canada.
Couros, A. (2010). Developing personal learning networks for open and social learning. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging Technologies in Distance Education (pp. 109-127). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.
Duncan-Howell, J. (2007). Online communities of practice and their role in professional development of teachers. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Franke, M.L., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. (1998) Understanding teachers’ self-sustaining, generative change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 67-80.
Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J. W., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P. J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 52(3), 47-66.
Lévy, P. (1997). Education and training: New technologies and collective intelligence. Prospects, 27(2), 248-263.
Lloyd, M. (2007). Where to next? – A new direction for the oz-TeacherNet. Retrieved from http://www.learningfutures.com.au/sites/default/files/Where2next%20OTN%20by%20Marg%20Lloyd.pdf
McKeown, L. (1996). oz-TeacherNet – Teachers helping teachers. Paper presented at AusWeb96, the Second Australian WorldWide Web Conference. Retrieved from http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw96/educn/mckeown/
Nykvist, S., Lloyd, M., & Masters, J., (2007). oz-TeacherNet 2.0: Redefining the education online community (pp. 325-330). In T. Hirashima, U. Hoppe, , & S. Shwu-Ching Young (Eds.), Supporting Learning Flow through Integrative Technologies. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS.
Pettenati, M. C., & Cigognini, M. E. (2007). Social networking theories and tools to support connectivist learning activities. Journal of Web Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 2(3), 42- 60. Retrieved from elilearning.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/ijwltt2007_pettenati_cigognini.pdf
Plickert, G., Côté, R. R., & Wellman, B. (2008). It's not who you know, it's how you know them: Who exchanges what with whom? Social Networks, 29(3), 405-429.
Rheingold, H. (2012). Net smart: How to thrive online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sharples, M. (2005). Learning as conversation: Transforming education in the mobile age. In Proceedings of Conference on Seeing, Understanding, Learning in the Mobile Age (pp. 147-152). Budapest, Hungary. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mike_Sharples/publication/228389244_Learning_as_conversation_Transforming_education_in_the_mobile_age/links/02e7e5277cfa803074000000.pdf
Skyring, C. (2014a). Professional learning in 140 characters. Paper presented at ACCE2014, Adelaide, September-October. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/82316/1/ACEC2014%20Paper%20Skyring.pdf
Skyring, C. (2014b). Learning in 140 characters: Microblogging for professional learning. Unpublished doctorate thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Stokes, J., & Masters, J. (2000). oz-TeacherNet: Supporting teacher use of information and communications technologies in the elementary curriculum. In J. Bourdeau & R. Heller (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2000 (pp. 1096-1100). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Tobin, D. R. (1998). Building your personal learning network. Retrieved from http://www.tobincls.com/learningnetwork.htm
Trust, T. (2012). Professional learning networks designed for teacher learning. Australian Educational Computing, 27(1), 34-38.
Wild, M. (1999). The anatomy of practice in the use of mailing lists: A case study. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15, (2), 117-135. Retrieved from http://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/1852
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
