Something’s coming, something good: Identifying TPACK competence in pre-service teachers’ analyses of learning objects
AbstractThere is a song at the beginning of the musical, West Side Story, where the character Tony sings that “something’s coming, something good.” The song is an anthem of optimism, brimming with promise. This paper is about the long-held promise of information and communication technology (ICT) to transform teaching and learning, to modernise the learning environment of the classroom, and to create a new digital pedagogy. But much of our experience to date in the schooling sector tells more of resistance and reaction than revolution, of more of the same but with a computer in the corner and of ICT activities as unwelcome time-fillers/time-wasters. Recently, a group of pre-service teachers in a postgraduate primary education degree in an Australian university were introduced to learning objects in an ICT immersion program. Their analyses and related responses, as recorded in online journals, have here been interpreted in terms of TPACK (Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge). Against contemporary observation, these students generally displayed high levels of competence and highly positive dispositions of students to the integration of ICT in their future classrooms. In short, they displayed the same optimism and confidence as the fictional “Tony” in believing that something good was coming.
Albion, P. (2003). Graduating teachers’ dispositions for integrating information and communications technologies into their teaching. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2003 (pp. 1592-1599). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Bernstein, L., & Sondheim, S. (1957). Something’s coming [music] : from West side story / lyrics by Stephen Sondheim ; music by Leonard Bernstein. Leonard Bernstein Music Publishing Company / Boosey & Hawkes.
Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1-21.
Chen, P., & McGrath, D. (2003, Spring). Moments of joy: Student engagement and conceptual learning in the design of hypermedia documents. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 402-422.
Cresswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Reforming schools through technology, 1980- 2000. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Department for Education and Employment (DFEE). (1997). Connecting the learning society. London: Department for Education and Employment.
Department of Education and Training (DETA). (n.d). Smart classrooms professional development framework. Retrieved July 14, 2008, from http://education.qld.gov.au/smartclassrooms/strategy/tsdev_pd.html
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Hedberg, J. (2006). Searching for disruptive pedagogies: Matching pedagogies to the technologies. Keynote address at Curriculum Corporation 13th National Conference, Adelaide, August 2006. Retrieved February 11, 2011, from http://cmslive.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/Hedberg_Paper.pdf
Jamieson-Proctor, R., Finger, G., & Albion, P. (2010). Auditing the TPACK Capabilities of Final Year Teacher Education Students: Are they ready for the 21st century? In D. Gronn, & G. Romeo (Eds), ACEC2010: Digital Diversity. Conference Proceedings of the Australian Computers in Education Conference 2010, Melbourne 6-9 April. Carlton, Victoria: ACCE. Retrieved February 2, 2011, from, http://acec2010.info/proposal/248/auditing-tpck-capabilities-final-year-teacher-education-students-are-they-ready-21st
Jonassen, D.H., Myers, J.M., & McKillop, A.M. (1996). From constructivism to constructionism: Learning with hypermedia/multimedia rather than from it. In B.G.Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 93-106). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., Groff, J., & Haas, J. (2009). Using the technology of today in the classroom today: The instructional power of digital games, social networking, simulations and how teachers can leverage them. The Education Arcade, MIT. Retrieved February 2, 2011, from http://education.mit.edu/papers/GamesSimsSocNets_EdArcade.pdf
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology, Handbook of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators (pp. 3-29). New York: Routledge.
MCEETYA (Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs). (2005). Contemporary learning. Learning in an online world. Carlton South, Australia: Curriculum Corporation. Retrieved September 30, 2010, from http://www.mceetya.edu.au/verve/_resources/Contemp_Learning_Final.pdf
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Oppenheimer, T. (2003). The flickering mind: The false promise of technology in the classroom and how learning can be saved. New York: Random House.
Oriogun, P. K., & Cave, D. (2008). Using code-recode to detect critical thinking aspects of asynchronous small group CMC collaborative learning. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(3), 208-226.
Reynolds, R. (2009). Teaching studies of society & environment in the primary school. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (2008). ICT competency standards for teachers. Paris: UNESCO.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).